<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AIGC检测 on AI内参</title>
    <link>https://www.neican.ai/tags/aigc%E6%A3%80%E6%B5%8B/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AIGC检测 on AI内参</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 21:40:03 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.neican.ai/tags/aigc%E6%A3%80%E6%B5%8B/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>毕业论文AI检测：让985学霸“一夜白头”的到底是啥黑科技？</title>
      <link>https://www.neican.ai/insights/ai985-20260526214003477-0/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 21:40:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.neican.ai/insights/ai985-20260526214003477-0/</guid>
      <description>讲的是高校开始严防毕业论文“AI代写”，结果AIGC检测工具却成了玄学，把《滕王阁序》都判成100%AI写的。文章深度揭秘了靠“困惑度”和“突发性”的检测原理，揭示了技术的不靠谱，并传授了通过写得更“反套路”、“更有个性”来骗过检测的方法。</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>算法的“审判”：当毕业论文被迫自证非AI，学术诚信体系正面临怎样的危机？</title>
      <link>https://www.neican.ai/insights/article-20260525084003404-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:40:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.neican.ai/insights/article-20260525084003404-3/</guid>
      <description>文章深度剖析了高校AIGC检测中“算法黑箱”引发的技术误判与学术异化，指出单一依赖检测工具已无法应对AI普及下的学术诚信挑战，并呼吁教育评价体系应从“文本查重”转型为“人机协作能力评估”。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
